The same scientists, who predicted a new Ice Age in the 1970's, predicted Global Warming in recent years. In 2012 a report has appeared, in which is concluded, that the average, global temperatures have not risen since 1997! Nothing is as unpredictable as the weather. Still these scientific data and predictions
have lead to all kind of economical and political measures. We have to drive electric or on solar power, to stop the process of global heating. Dikes are very important in my country and the doom-scenario's were used to put pressure on politics, to prepare for the worst. Probably the reports by the IPCC (United Nations) and Al Gore's “An Inconvenient truth” were mostly politically and economically motivated. The results of the scientific material published by the United Nations and Gore's media hype, were debated from the beginning. The assumption of increasing temperatures due to greenhouse-emissions prooved to be wrong. It was the other way round! Sea-levels were not rising and the melting down of the Arctic happened much slower, than predicted. All this, was of no influence. Scientists who critized the official view, were marginalized and had to fear for their funding and career. Science was put under an enormous pressure to proof that global warming was manmade and that global meausures are needed. But countries like India, USA and India are paying for “emission-rights” of unpolluting countries, so keep on polluting the air. It's all capitalism and cooperate imperialism. Kyoto c.s. created an enormous business opportunity, we have to pay and will be taxed for. Back to Al Gore. He got a Nobel Peace Price for his efforts to save the world. He described the dramatic future of the polar bear. This beautiful animal was doomed to go extinct. Why? Because of the melting ice. The bears had to swim many miles and would drown. Proof: an Canadian article. When global warming-critics read it, they were shocked. It was the report of a pilot, who had seen 4 dead bears, during a fly-over. The animals had drowned, because of a giant polarstorm. There was no relation to global warming at all. From 1972 untill now the number of polar bears has doubled. From under the glaciers of Greenland, old Bronze Age villages appear. The weather was good enough to grow barley to produce their own beer. The polar bears have survived the last periods of global warming. By the way, CO2 is not so bad, plants love it.
Dan Pangburn heeft een nieuwe reactie op uw bericht "GLOBAL LYING" achtergelaten:
Paraphrasing Richard Feynman: Regardless of how many experts believe it or how many organizations concur, if it doesn’t agree with observation, it’s wrong.
The IPCC and many others perceive that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide was the primary cause of global warming. Measurements demonstrate that they are wrong.
The average global temperature trend has been flat since 2001. No amount of spin can rationalize that the temperature increase to 2001 was caused by CO2 increase but that 25.9% additional CO2 increase had no effect on the average global temperature trend after 2001.
Without human caused global warming there can be no human caused climate change.
Average GLOBAL temperature anomalies are reported on the web by NOAA, GISS, Hadley, RSS and UAH. The first three all draw from the same data base of surface measurement data. The last two draw from the data base of satellite measurements. Each agency processes the data slightly differently from the others. Each believes that their way is most accurate. To avoid bias, I average all five. The averages are listed here.
2001 0.3473
2002 0.4278
2003 0.4245
2004 0.3641
2005 0.4663
2006 0.3930
2007 0.4030
2008 0.2598
2009 0.4022
2010 0.5298
2011 0.3316
A straight line (trend line) fit to this data has no slope. That means that, for over a decade, average global temperature has not changed. If the average thru September in 2012 (0.3526) is included, the slope is down.
Find out what really caused the warm up during the 20th century in my stuff made public at the Climate Realists web site.
Dan Pangburn heeft een nieuwe reactie op uw bericht "GLOBAL LYING" achtergelaten:
Paraphrasing Richard Feynman: Regardless of how many experts believe it or how many organizations concur, if it doesn’t agree with observation, it’s wrong.
The IPCC and many others perceive that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide was the primary cause of global warming. Measurements demonstrate that they are wrong.
The average global temperature trend has been flat since 2001. No amount of spin can rationalize that the temperature increase to 2001 was caused by CO2 increase but that 25.9% additional CO2 increase had no effect on the average global temperature trend after 2001.
Without human caused global warming there can be no human caused climate change.
Average GLOBAL temperature anomalies are reported on the web by NOAA, GISS, Hadley, RSS and UAH. The first three all draw from the same data base of surface measurement data. The last two draw from the data base of satellite measurements. Each agency processes the data slightly differently from the others. Each believes that their way is most accurate. To avoid bias, I average all five. The averages are listed here.
2001 0.3473
2002 0.4278
2003 0.4245
2004 0.3641
2005 0.4663
2006 0.3930
2007 0.4030
2008 0.2598
2009 0.4022
2010 0.5298
2011 0.3316
A straight line (trend line) fit to this data has no slope. That means that, for over a decade, average global temperature has not changed. If the average thru September in 2012 (0.3526) is included, the slope is down.
Find out what really caused the warm up during the 20th century in my stuff made public at the Climate Realists web site.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten